Carol Platt Liebau: With Us, Or Against Us

Monday, June 12, 2006

With Us, Or Against Us

That's what President Bush told the world in the wake of the 9/11 attacks; that's why we toppled the Taliban when it wouldn't give up Al Qaeda.

Now, documents indicate that there were contacts between the highest levels of the Iraqi government and Al Qaeda/Taliban officials.

If these turn out to be true, what will the liberals say? After all, the Taliban had "nothing" to do with 9/11, either . . . .


Blogger COPioneer said...

There are no more left wing nutters reading your blog Carol. But yes, it seems quite clear to me that we are in a war against Islamo-Fascists. Not just "terrorists". We need to start calling it what it is...Islamic Jihad.

If we don't recognize the Elephants in the living room, it's too our own peril.

9:08 AM  
Blogger Pete said...

Ah, if it were only true, Copioneer. But, alas, I did not see a couple of the most mean-spirited left join in the exodus. I am sure that when we think it safe to go in the water...

Otherwise, I agree. Our war is on two fronts - the world stage where we battle the Islamo-Fascists, and the home stage where we battle the surrender monkeys of the left. For the freedom of ALL who wish it, we must win on both stages.

12:17 PM  
Blogger Greg said...

They will say:

It depends on what the meaning of "is" is.

They will say:

It doesn't matter. Bush is the one who created all the terrorists anyway.

They will say:

Lies! Lies! It's all LIES made up by Bush/Cheney/Rove/Rumsfeld.

They will say:

Oh my God! We'd better alert the U.N. to this. They're our only hope!

They will say:

Surrender now! Then maybe, just maybe, they'll leave us alone. There's nothing else we can do.

They will never say:

Islamofascism/Terrorism is a serious threat to all the freedom-loving peoples of the earth and has already grown far more powerful and dangerous than ever should have been allowed. We must destroy this cancer before it destroys us.

12:43 PM  
Blogger Duke-Stir said...

Or, if the tables were turned and I was Carol Liebau, I would automatically go about discrediting the messenger who in this case appears to be a nutcase with a political agenda and who also contends that Iraq SUCCESSFULLY DETONATED A NUCLEAR WEAPON (unbeknownst to the rest of the world).

4:45 PM  
Blogger wrabkin said...

Duke-Stir --

You don't understand. It doesn't matter if the document is an obvious forgery written by a crazy person. It's a DOCUMENT. Therefore, it proves Bush was right all along, and we all have to believe it.

6:05 PM  
Blogger JillMartin said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

6:29 PM  
Blogger One Salient Oversight said...

The fact that Fox came out with this is important. They've been pro war all the time.

One document proves nothing. If you're going to be consistent about this then America should invade Saudi Arabia as well - they had far more connections with 9/11 than Iraq ever did.

Iraq was never a threat - they had no WMDs and no provable ties to Osama. America's safety was never threatened by Iraq.

9/11 will have its fifth anniversary this year. Osama is still free.

11:46 PM  
Blogger Pete said...

They're baaaack!

And surprise, the same old mindless diatribe. Just because something doesn't appear on the MSM it's not real? And it seems that the word was documentS - the 's' indicating plural. Details - the left needs them not!

And repeating lies do not make them true, OSO. But they do make Bush look bad, and that is the main idea - isn't it? Nice try - no sale!

12:14 PM  
Blogger JillMartin said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

2:35 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home