Pro-Choice Candidate in PA Senate Race?
Looks like the pro-choicers may be trying to victimize yet another Bob Casey.
So much for the party of "tolerance." Compare and contrast -- the GOP is willing to give Rudy Giuliani a good hard look, despite his pro-choice credentials. (HT: Real Clear Politics blog.)
So much for the party of "tolerance." Compare and contrast -- the GOP is willing to give Rudy Giuliani a good hard look, despite his pro-choice credentials. (HT: Real Clear Politics blog.)
posted by Carol Platt Liebau at 1:55 PM
3 Comments:
If you're going to refer to Casey as pro-life, you had better put that term in quotation marks.
Casey Jr, is as much of a fraud as his old man.
Casey Sr grandstanded about his pro-life credentials. But then low and behold history provided him with the opportunity to put his money where his mouth was, when John Heinz died in a helicopter crash.
And what exactly did Casey do?
I'll tell ya what he did, he dithered, and it went on and on, and on. Until such time as the local newspapers and pols demanded that he make a selection, and appoint someone to fill Heiz's term.
But Casey told us he was looking high and low throughout the hills and dales of Pennsylvania, for a pro-life politician who met his with his standards.
And who did he pick, of all the GENUINE and LEGITIMATE pro-life politicians in Pennsylvania, who did he select?
He selected HARRIS WOFFORD, that's who he picked, former peace corps activist.
And SUPPOSEDLY Wofford was as pro-life as old Bob, but then, history provided Wofford an opportunity to demonstrate his pro-life credentials.
And which way do you think Wofford voted, he voted Democrat party line. That's what he did.
Don't bother paying lip service to the pro-life credentials of a Casey, father or son.
The father was a fraud, likewise the son.
Anyone who gave a damn about traditional values has long since left that party.
Carol writes, "So much for the party of 'tolerance.'"
Carol, just out of curiousity, can you even read?
How does Kate Michelman talking of launching a third party candidacy have anything at all to do the Democratic party?
How does Kate Michelman talking of launching a third party candidacy have anything at all to do the Democratic party?
Nothing, per se, unless she goes ahead with it and pulls a few percent from the Democrat.
Post a Comment
<< Home