What a Bunch of Babies
If Republicans reacted this way every time a MSM columnist criticized one of their leaders, they'd be in a perpetual state of outrage.
Good heavens. Democrats don't seem much to care if America loses the war in Iraq, but they are all fight when David Broder criticizes Harry Reid. Strange priorities, no?
Good heavens. Democrats don't seem much to care if America loses the war in Iraq, but they are all fight when David Broder criticizes Harry Reid. Strange priorities, no?
posted by LadybugUSA at 6:15 PM
4 Comments:
Not really. Broder has absolutely no credibility these days.
Broder's problem is that he refuses to face facts, he refuses to acknowledge his wrong predictions, and refuses to even admit that he's cheerleading for Bush.
He's actually a good example of why the media is biased against the left.
... the media is biased against the left. (Guffaw!) I see OSO reads Media Matters and Huffpo talking points.
Survey upon survey shows Americans recognize the MSM leans so far left it has both training wheels on that side of its bikes. Even former Network heads have said their own people are leftists. The "journalists" themselves admit they vote heavily Democrat.
When Bernard Goldberg dared to criticize the MSM, giving concrete examples of individual and corporate bias in favor of the Left in several books, he suffered the same fate as Mr. Broder is now facing. I wonder how long it will be before Broder is excommunicated from the Left's Friday evening PBS and Sunday morning "news" shows.
"He's actually a good example of why the media is biased against the left."
Haha. That's funny.
Mainly Americablog and Think Progress. But it all disseminates down.
Post a Comment
<< Home