Read It & Tremble
From a 2003 speech:
"The United States does not need a multi-billion-dollar national missile defense against the possibility of a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile."
Really? Care to reconsider in light of the successful North Korean tests?
You might wonder: Who, exactly, is the feckless politican who asserted the irrelevance of national missile defense? Well, it's Nancy Pelosi -- the Democrats' choice for Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency and therefore to being commander in chief) if their party regains control. (HT: Hugh Hewitt).
"The United States does not need a multi-billion-dollar national missile defense against the possibility of a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile."
Really? Care to reconsider in light of the successful North Korean tests?
You might wonder: Who, exactly, is the feckless politican who asserted the irrelevance of national missile defense? Well, it's Nancy Pelosi -- the Democrats' choice for Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency and therefore to being commander in chief) if their party regains control. (HT: Hugh Hewitt).
posted by Carol Platt Liebau at 2:44 PM
1 Comments:
Ya know, if I have made stupid remarks , taken stupid positions, in the past, how will I have any credibility if I take logical, reasonable, sensible positions today, even, horrors, positions that contradict some of my stupid remarks of the past?
As someone said, you can get stuck on stupid.
Post a Comment
<< Home