Read It & Tremble
From a 2003 speech:
"The United States does not need a multi-billion-dollar national missile defense against the possibility of a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile."
Really? Care to reconsider in light of the successful North Korean tests?
You might wonder: Who, exactly, is the feckless politican who asserted the irrelevance of national missile defense? Well, it's Nancy Pelosi -- the Democrats' choice for Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency and therefore to being commander in chief) if their party regains control. (HT: Hugh Hewitt).
"The United States does not need a multi-billion-dollar national missile defense against the possibility of a nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missile."
Really? Care to reconsider in light of the successful North Korean tests?
You might wonder: Who, exactly, is the feckless politican who asserted the irrelevance of national missile defense? Well, it's Nancy Pelosi -- the Democrats' choice for Speaker of the House (second in line to the presidency and therefore to being commander in chief) if their party regains control. (HT: Hugh Hewitt).
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home