Finally
Nancy Pelosi and Charlie Rangel have now, apparently, figured out that it's ridiculously inappropriate to remain silent when Hugo Chavez directs his invective at the President of the United States, even though they disagree with him.
It's noteworthy that Chavez is trying to prove he's a great guy by giving low cost or oil to poor Americans (who should, in my opinion, tell him to go pound sand). It's pretty rich for a guy coming from a country with a poverty rate like Venezuala's.
It's noteworthy that Chavez is trying to prove he's a great guy by giving low cost or oil to poor Americans (who should, in my opinion, tell him to go pound sand). It's pretty rich for a guy coming from a country with a poverty rate like Venezuala's.
posted by LadybugUSA at 6:52 PM
2 Comments:
Pelosi spoke out not because she thought it was inappropriate to remain silent, but because she thought it was not to her party's political advantage to remain silent.
I'm surprised Pelosi said a word, frankly. I'm not at all surprised that Rangel was trotted out to give the response.
I'm also not surprised that the faux-editor has nothing in the way of a response to Chavez. Fellow travelers? You decide.
Post a Comment
<< Home