wrabkin...would that be the same commenter who changes the subject for the chance to trash talk about a conservative?
The point is that Newt has a brain between his ears which which processes data in a very logical and intuitive way. He has a far better idea of what is going on in Iraq than, say, an editor does and does so in a far more objective manner. Now one can focus on his personal life, of which I've never heard any proven details for the events surrounding his divorce, or on the points he makes in his opinion pieces, which are, at least in this case, spot on.
As I recall, he resigned for the good of the party, rather than to be a disruption. Hardly disgraceful, and hardly the type of thing on would expect of a lib.
Talk about forgetting history, and this history is like freakin' yesterday. It's like this, kids: Clinton was to be impeached for lying under oath. You got that? He broke a law. Doesn't your history record that little detail? If Clinton was a man, he'd of saved himself that little impeachment mess, but NOOOOOOO! He had to pretend there was nothing going on, even under oath, just so Hillary wouldn't slap the crap out of him, or he wouldn't be viewed as the philanderer he is. Geez!! What a couple of twits.
3 Comments:
Newt always has great insight.
wrabkin...would that be the same commenter who changes the subject for the chance to trash talk about a conservative?
The point is that Newt has a brain between his ears which which processes data in a very logical and intuitive way. He has a far better idea of what is going on in Iraq than, say, an editor does and does so in a far more objective manner. Now one can focus on his personal life, of which I've never heard any proven details for the events surrounding his divorce, or on the points he makes in his opinion pieces, which are, at least in this case, spot on.
As I recall, he resigned for the good of the party, rather than to be a disruption. Hardly disgraceful, and hardly the type of thing on would expect of a lib.
Talk about forgetting history, and this history is like freakin' yesterday. It's like this, kids: Clinton was to be impeached for lying under oath. You got that? He broke a law. Doesn't your history record that little detail? If Clinton was a man, he'd of saved himself that little impeachment mess, but NOOOOOOO! He had to pretend there was nothing going on, even under oath, just so Hillary wouldn't slap the crap out of him, or he wouldn't be viewed as the philanderer he is. Geez!! What a couple of twits.
Post a Comment
<< Home