Coincidence? You Decide
This piece from The Wall Street Journal helps explain why it's a fallacy to equate a Missouri law (struck down by the state Supreme Court) requiring identification at the polls with a "poll tax."
It also begs the question: Why do Democrats like Claire McCaskill oppose requiring voter identification? Could it have anything to do with the fraudulent ballots submitted by her friends at ACORN?
It also begs the question: Why do Democrats like Claire McCaskill oppose requiring voter identification? Could it have anything to do with the fraudulent ballots submitted by her friends at ACORN?
posted by LadybugUSA at 10:27 PM
1 Comments:
You criticize Claire McCaskill for opposing voter ID. I don't think you support her. But at the very top of your main page displaying this entry you have an ad for the same woman. Strange.
Post a Comment
<< Home