Update on CIA Firing
Looks like when I wrote about the shamefully politicized CIA, we didn't know the half of it.
The New York Times reports that the fired CIA employee was a Kerry supporter, promoted by Sandy "Docs in Socks" Berger during the Clinton Administration.
How shameful that she would jeopardize the war on terror by leaking classified information because of what look like partisan disagreements with the Bush Administration.
If she was that opposed to the Administration's policies, why didn't she resign?
And how many more like her are still there?
The New York Times reports that the fired CIA employee was a Kerry supporter, promoted by Sandy "Docs in Socks" Berger during the Clinton Administration.
How shameful that she would jeopardize the war on terror by leaking classified information because of what look like partisan disagreements with the Bush Administration.
If she was that opposed to the Administration's policies, why didn't she resign?
And how many more like her are still there?
posted by LadybugUSA at 10:49 PM
4 Comments:
How deep the mole? Clinton damage continues.
I heard someone using the Watergate word in reference to this administration. Boy, they have that right. Only difference is that the administration is the victim this time around. The perps are hang-overs from the last admin and who knows who is pulling the strings......I think we can guess
wrabkin - I don't believe the totality of what classified information Ms. McCarthy leaked has yet been made public, so we don't yet know exactly what all she leaked. In fact, Carol's earlier post linked to an MSNBC piece that specifically said, "Information about subjects other than the prisons may have been leaked as well."
Nice try, but no cigar.
Anyone think that the secret prison story was a set up from the beginning to see who would feed it to the press? Perhaps certain leftovers from the previous admin had been targeted from the beginning as possible leakers. Call me stupid and naive but I would love to believe that the CIA is really as clever and mission impossible-like as the novels would have us believe and they are rooting out those that would bring an administration down in very devious ways. Why not?
So we CAN have it both ways... the Times is right, the secret prisons don't exist and the leaking issue is a valid one......TA DA
Post a Comment
<< Home