Carol Platt Liebau

Monday, March 14, 2005

The imperial judiciary strikes again. "No rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," according to the judge. So reserving special protection for the optimal climate for having and raising children is "irrational"? Please. Certainly gays need certain legal protections, and always respectful treatment, but an activist judiciary forcing change on an unwilling public is hardly the way to effect even necessary reforms.


Post a Comment

<< Home